Artificial Sweeteners: Should we consume or not?

-

 



Common Lies vs Scientific Evidence on Artificial Sweeteners

1. “Artificial sweeteners cause cancer.”

  • Evidence:
    • Early 1970s rat studies with saccharin showed bladder cancer, but only at extremely high doses far beyond human consumption.
    • Large human studies (Nurses’ Health Study, NIH-AARP cohort, etc.) show no significant cancer risk at normal intake.
    • WHO (2023) classed aspartame as “possibly carcinogenic” but emphasized that risk is negligible at typical consumption (a person would need to drink >12 cans of diet soda daily for concern).

 Fact: No strong human evidence linking artificial sweeteners to cancer when consumed within recommended limits.

 

2. “They are toxic chemicals.”

  • Evidence:
    • All approved sweeteners (aspartame, sucralose, acesulfame K, saccharin, etc.) undergo strict testing by FDA, EFSA, WHO.
    • Each has an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) with a 100-fold safety margin.
    • Example: For aspartame, ADI = 40 mg/kg/day. 

 Fact: At normal dietary levels, artificial sweeteners in very small quantity are considered safe, not toxic.

 

3. “They cause diabetes.”

  • Evidence:
    • Artificial sweeteners do not raise blood sugar directly.
    • Some studies suggest changes in gut microbiome (especially with saccharin and sucralose) may affect glucose tolerance.
    • But randomized controlled trials (RCTs) generally show neutral effects compared to sugar.

 Fact: They do not cause diabetes; for people with diabetes, they are a safer option if they want to consume sugar. Effects on gut bacteria need more research studies.

 

4. “They help with weight loss automatically.”

  • Evidence:
    • Replacing sugar with sweeteners reduces calorie intake in the short term.
    • Long-term studies: mixed results. Some show weight reduction, others show no change, and some even show weight gain (likely due to compensatory eating).

Fact: They are not a magic solution of weight control. Lifestyle modifications and food quality still matter.

 

5. “Natural is always better (honey/stevia over artificial).”

  • Evidence:
    • Honey, jaggery, coconut sugar → still high in calories, raise blood glucose.
    • Stevia and monk fruit are “natural” non-nutritive sweeteners and are safe, but  again in limited amount.

Fact: Artificial and natural sweeteners both have pros/cons. The real issue is total sugar load and dietary balance.

Conclusion:

  • Artificial sweeteners are not deadly poisons as some claim.
  • They are safe within ADI, can help with diabetes if they want to consume sugar, and pose no proven cancer risk in humans.
  • The real caution is that they may sustain a preference for sweetness and keep diets highly processed.

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Eating well. New vitamin D guidelines

-
Image
 In 2024, Harvard Health Publishing and the Endocrine Society updated their guidelines on vitamin D supplementation, emphasizing tailored recommendations based on age, health status, and specific risk factors. General Recommendations: Adults Under 75: For healthy adults under 75, routine vitamin D supplementation beyond the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) is generally unnecessary. The RDA remains at 600 IU (15 micrograms) daily for adults up to age 70 and 800 IU (20 micrograms) for those over 70.  Adults 75 and Older: Supplementation above the RDA may be beneficial due to potential reductions in mortality risk. A daily intake of 1,000 IU is considered acceptable for this age group.  Specific Populations: Children and Adolescents (1-18 years): Empiric vitamin D supplementation is suggested to prevent nutritional rickets and potentially lower the risk of respiratory tract infections.  Pregnant Individuals: Supplementation may reduce risks such as preeclampsia, intr...
Read more

Title: Which Diet Is Better? Clearing the Confusion Around a Balanced Diet

-
Image
  Title: Which Diet Is Better? Clearing the Confusion Around a Balanced Diet In today’s world of nutritional overload, it's easy to feel lost in the maze of diet recommendations. One day keto is king, the next it's Mediterranean, and then you’re told to go plant-based. So which diet is truly better? And more importantly, how do you choose a balanced diet that suits you? Let’s unravel the confusion. Understanding the Word “Balanced” A balanced diet isn’t about extremes—it’s about providing your body with all the essential nutrients it needs: carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, minerals, and water. The balance means you're not cutting out entire food groups unnecessarily or overindulging in others. Popular Diets at a Glance 1. Mediterranean Diet Rich in fruits, vegetables, olive oil, whole grains, and fish. Pros: Heart-friendly, anti-inflammatory. Cons: May be expensive in some regions. 2. Low-Carb/Keto Diet High fat, moderate protein, low carbohydrate intake. Pros: Effe...
Read more

How Food Affects Common Medicines: What You Must Know

-
Image
  How Food Affects Common Medicines: What You Must Know. Did you know that something as simple as a glass of grapefruit juice or a plate of spinach can interfere with your medication? It’s true! Certain foods can reduce a drug’s effectiveness or even increase its side effects. If you're on regular medications like those for blood pressure, diabetes, or cholesterol, this blog is for you. Let’s dive into the most common food-drug interactions—and how you can safely plan your meals around your medicines. What Is a Food-Drug Interaction? A food-drug interaction happens when something you eat changes how a medicine works in your body. This can: Block absorption of the drug Increase or decrease drug levels in your blood Cause side effects or toxicity Why it matters: These interactions can be dangerous if ignored—especially for people with chronic conditions like hypertension, diabetes, or heart disease. Common Medicines and Their Food Interactions 1. Antihypertensive Medicines (Blood Pre...
Read more